Federal Forest Resources
Fact Sheets. Info-graphics. Timber Sale Resources
MEDIUM Concern
Borderlands Conservation Act
SUMMARY: Legislative Explainer
Despite its title, S.2967 is not a conservation bill in any real sense. It uses the language of land management – fuels reduction, invasive species, wildland fire – to justify expanding DHS and Border Patrol access roads, and infrastructure on federal public lands along the borders including in Wilderness and Roadless Areas, while eliminating legal protections for those lands.
CRITICAL: Would REQUIRE ROAD BUILDING AND LOGGING in Wilderness Areas
STATUS: Being considered by the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee
MEDIUM Concern
Torch Act
SUMMARY: Legislative Explainer
H.R.7578 would expand federal logging authority by creating new categorical exclusions (CEs) and and enlarging existing ones. These CEs get little environmental analysis and have no requirements for public notice, let alone public input. It would also loosen timber sale oversight, expands destructive livestock grazing projects and weakens protections provided by the ESA.
CRITICAL: Creates new tools to avoid environmental analysis while weakening the ESA
STATUS: Being considered by the House Ag. Committee and Natural Resources Committee
HIGH Concern
The 'Landless' Bill
Summary: Legislative Explainer + Call to Action
The Bill would permanently transfer 115,200 acres of federal public land from the Tongass National Forest to newly created, for-profit, Alaska Native Urban corporations ostensibly representing five SE Alaska communities. Corporations with a long history of clear-cut logging and making millionaires of their board members while providing meager benefits to the Native communities they claim to serve.
CRITICAL: Would permanently transfer around 100K+ acres of National Forest to for-profit corporations
STATUS: Has passed in the House and was approved by committee in the Senate leaving it one vote away from becoming law.
HIGH Concern
Roadless Rule - Wildfire Connection
SUMMARY: Fact-sheet + Call to Action
Congress and the Administration are justifying their efforts to kill the 'Roadless Rule' by arguing the rule stands in the way of public safety because it hampers Agencies' abilities to fight dangerous wildfire. This premise is false. The research shows that in most cases thinning increases fire intensity and that more roads will lead to more ignitions – not far in the backcountry, but near human development.
CRITICAL: Efforts to end Roadless are underway in Congress through S.140 (most recent action 6/10/26) and H.R.7695 (most recent action 5/21/26). And by the Administration through a rules repeal at USDA– comment period is expected Q3 '26
HIGH Concern
Roadless Rule - Basics
SUMMARY: Fact-sheet + Call to Action
The Roadless Area Conservation Rule was adopted in 2001 following hundreds of public meetings
and 1.6 million public comments overwhelmingly in support. It provides special protection for more
than 45 million acres of inventoried roadless areas within the National Forest System, preventing new permanent road building and commercial logging while allowing fuel management and other wildfire risk reduction efforts.
CRITICAL: Efforts to end Roadless are underway in Congress through S.140 (most recent action 6/10/26) and H.R.7695 (most recent action 5/21/26). And by the Administration through a rules repeal at USDA– comment period is expected Q3 '26
LOW Concern
Forest Health & Wildfire Risk Reduction Act
SUMMARY: Legislative Explainer
Creates a new Categorical Exclusion (CE) for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to carry out high-impact forest thinning projects up to 5,000 acres without a thorough analysis of the impacts of the project.
CRITICAL: Yet another low-oversight categorical exclusion allowing commercial logging with no public oversight
STATUS: Being considered by the House Committee on Natural Resources







